Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar.
s6756218Miscellaneous (editorials, letters)17812530Total2,081 2,0531 base and leveraging the database’s functions to pro-mote open access to research.
متن کاملComparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches.
BACKGROUND Literature searches are essential to evidence-based respiratory care. To conduct literature searches, respiratory therapists rely on search engines to retrieve information, but there is a dearth of literature on the comparative efficiencies of search engines for researching clinical questions in respiratory care. OBJECTIVE To compare PubMed and Google Scholar search results for cli...
متن کاملRetrieving Clinical Evidence: A Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for Quick Clinical Searches
BACKGROUND Physicians frequently search PubMed for information to guide patient care. More recently, Google Scholar has gained popularity as another freely accessible bibliographic database. OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. METHODS We surveyed nephrologists (kidney specialists) and provided each with a unique clinical question derived from 100 r...
متن کاملThe comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews
BACKGROUND The usefulness of Google Scholar (GS) as a bibliographic database for biomedical systematic review (SR) searching is a subject of current interest and debate in research circles. Recent research has suggested GS might even be used alone in SR searching. This assertion is challenged here by testing whether GS can locate all studies included in 21 previously published SRs. Second, it e...
متن کاملComparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
The evolution of the electronic age has led to the development of numerous medical databases on the World Wide Web, offering search facilities on a particular subject and the ability to perform citation analysis. We compared the content coverage and practical utility of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The official Web pages of the databases were used to extract information o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1536-5050,1558-9439
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.442